I was browsing through one of those magazines that have a tendency to find their way into stacks on tables around campus; one of those magazines where the cheif demographic is single, Christian, upper-middle class, white people who are living in the Johnson County area who are looking for other single, Christian, upper-middle class, white people who are living in the Johnson County area and are also looking. Now, let's not jump to conclusions: I was waiting for my shift to start I wasn't looking for this magazine, it was right there and I wanted to appear busy. That's all, I swear. There was a little blurb in a box on one of the pages with a title that read something to the effect of Ways to Take Advantage of Your Singleness While You've Still Got It or something equally lame. This blurb was filled with things like: "Squeeze the toothpaste from the middle of the tube because no one's there to tell you not to" or "Drive to the city and spend the weekend getting pampered at a spa- why not? You don't have to schedule your life around anyone else!" or "Eat ice cream right out of the carton and don't worry about anyone else eating the remainder."
Part of me felt heavy, kind of lacking. I can't help but be a little disapointed to find that the greatest joy in being single is an excuse to get a pedicure. I know it's not, but why does it have to be presented as such? Why does singleness have to be seen as that stage that everyone has to go through before they get married? I just don't think that it's the means to an end--especially if that end is only marriage. Don't get me wrong, I think that marriage can be a wonderful thing, a beautiful friendship and a great gift, I do. I don't, however, believe that it's everything that God ever wanted for me. I want to see his glory.
I read an article a few days ago that said that the percentage of singles in the church is rising I think it's great to have single people in the church, I find it hard to believe that anyone would be discouraged by the fact but people are (Is it any wonder? The divorce rate within the church is currently at 51%, who wants to jump into that??). The idea that marriage is the default state for those in church attendance is certainly not a new one. Christian authors have been writing books (and apparently publishing cheap magazines) about singleness for years. There's an idea that man was made with a hole in his heart that was shaped for his one-day lady friend and vice-versa. The idea that a man can not be whole and complete without his female counterpart is a very popular theory. Don't get me wrong, I really believe that humans were made for relationship. I do believe that Adam and Eve were placed together in the garden to be friends, to be lovers, to populate, to have and to hold yadda yadda yadda. But I do not believe that Adam would never have been whole without Eve. In his book Wild At Heart, John Eldridge claims that a man's deepest longing is to rescue a woman, his beauty and that her deepest longing is to be rescued by him. “Why is this story so deep in our psyche? Every little girl knows the fable without ever being told. She dreams one day her prince will come. Little boys rehearse their part with wooden swords and cardboard shields. And one day the boy, now a young man, realizes that he wants to be the one to win the beauty.” That's all fine, I guess, if you want to think that our very existance has always centered around the idea of getting married. (What happens, btw, when you've reached your ultimate goal at the age of 30. Oh Lord, I can't imagine what we'd do.) But then, and this will serve as a fantastic example suit to prove that John Eldridge does not really understand the heart of a woman, not this woman at least: the world, he claims, “…kills a woman’s heart when it tells her to be tough, efficient, and independent.” Dear Mr. Eldridge, I think you're full of crap. Love, Libby (who just so happens to be efficient and have an entire spirit)
Here are my thoughts on the subject: I'm kind of thinking that it was imparitave that Adam and Eve get married (be married, whatever they did. I don't know how they pulled off the whole shebang sans flower girl/ best man). Imagine a world where Adam and Eve did not get married... yeah, uh huh. Pretty desolate. Given that they didn't eat from that dang tree, they'd still be sitting here, naked, a million years later, sick and tired of playing hangman. It as crucial that they procreate and have babies and populate the earth. Later on, God established his covenant through a line of people. For God's plan to take effect, his people had to grow up, get married, have sex and thus produce babies who would also be good little Jews to go on and do likewise. But at this point in time, God's kingdom is no longer being established by having Jewish babies so why, oh why, the idea that married people get to sit at the grown-up table at church and the singles get stuck in with the college kids and the youth group? Why is there a specific "singles ministry"? What's the difference? Can I, a 23 year-old single woman not relate to my married counterpart? Could I not learn from her, or even she from me? Why the seperation, why the distinction? Why are singles being treated like they're waiting in line for something instead of being ministered to/ allowed to minister? God's ultimate glory will be shown in the lives of believers and non-believers, marrieds and singles, children and elderly alike. Let it be so.
Love, Libby Marie
Chatboard (0)